How to Avoid False Shelf Life Predictions in Accelerated Stability Studies

Accelerated stability testing offers pharmaceutical developers a time-saving method for estimating shelf life. However, relying solely on accelerated data poses the risk of inaccurate predictions. Misinterpretation of degradation trends, variability in conditions, or inappropriate modeling can lead to false shelf life estimates — jeopardizing product quality and regulatory compliance. This expert guide outlines actionable strategies to mitigate these risks in your accelerated stability programs.

Understanding the Shelf Life Prediction Process

Accelerated stability testing involves exposing pharmaceutical products to elevated conditions (usually 40°C ± 2°C / 75% RH ± 5% RH) for up to 6 months. Using this data, shelf life at normal storage conditions is projected — often using the Arrhenius model or linear regression. While efficient, these models are sensitive to variability and require sound experimental design.

Primary Risks of False Predictions:

• Overestimation of shelf life due to stable accelerated results
• Underestimation leading to reduced market viability
• Unexpected degradation during real-time studies

1. Incomplete Understanding of Degradation Pathways

One of the most common pitfalls is predicting shelf life without fully characterizing degradation pathways. Some degradation mechanisms may not activate under accelerated conditions.

Example:

Photodegradation may be absent in a dark-stored accelerated chamber but become relevant in real-time light exposure. Likewise, humidity-driven hydrolysis may not appear in dry-accelerated studies.

Mitigation Strategies:

• Conduct preliminary stress testing to identify degradation routes
• Use targeted conditions (e.g., photostability, oxidative, freeze-thaw)
• Incorporate accelerated data into broader risk assessments

2. Inappropriate Kinetic Modeling

Many studies assume first-order kinetics for all degradation — which is not always valid. Inappropriate use of the Arrhenius equation without proper rate determination can distort shelf life projections.

Tips for Accurate Modeling:

• Test degradation at three or more temperatures (e.g., 40°C, 50°C, 60°C)
• Determine rate constants (k) empirically from degradation slopes
• Fit data to both zero- and first-order models and compare r² values

3. Ignoring Batch Variability

Using data from a single batch in an accelerated study can misrepresent variability across production. Regulatory agencies expect stability studies to reflect worst-case scenarios.

Recommended Practice:

• Use three primary batches for accelerated testing
• Include at least one batch with maximum impurity levels (worst case)
• Calculate mean shelf life with standard deviation

4. Packaging Influence on Prediction Accuracy

Packaging plays a crucial role in product stability. Using packaging with poor barrier properties during accelerated testing can over-predict degradation, leading to false shelf life conclusions.

Best Practices:

• Conduct accelerated studies in final market-intended packaging
• Validate container closure integrity prior to study
• Monitor for moisture ingress or oxygen transmission during study

5. Misinterpretation of Analytical Variability

Subtle variations in analytical results (e.g., assay, dissolution) can be mistaken for degradation trends. This is especially true for borderline results near specification limits.

Minimizing Analytical Error:

• Use stability-indicating methods validated per ICH Q2(R1)
• Establish method precision and inter-analyst reproducibility
• Review all results with statistical confidence intervals

6. Lack of Statistical Rigor in Shelf Life Extrapolation

Agencies expect predictive shelf life estimates to be backed by statistical evaluation, including regression analysis and confidence intervals.

Recommendations:

• Use regression software (e.g., JMP, Minitab, R) for modeling
• Include 95% confidence intervals in extrapolated estimates
• Assess goodness-of-fit metrics like R², RMSE

7. Disregarding Significant Change Criteria

Significant changes during accelerated testing — such as failure in assay or dissolution — invalidate shelf life predictions and require additional intermediate condition studies.

ICH Definition of Significant Change:

• Assay changes by >5%
• Failure to meet dissolution or impurity limits
• Physical changes (color, odor, phase separation)

Action Steps:

• Include intermediate studies (e.g., 30°C/65% RH)
• Document any significant change and its impact
• Submit justification for shelf life assignment or revision

8. Regulatory Audit Failures Due to Overestimated Shelf Life

False shelf life predictions can lead to regulatory observations, product recalls, and loss of credibility. Agencies expect conservative, data-driven decisions.

Agency Expectations:

• Ongoing real-time studies to confirm accelerated predictions
• Scientific rationale for extrapolation
• Inclusion of stress testing to support degradation understanding

For accelerated stability modeling templates and SOPs, visit Pharma SOP. For tutorials on predictive modeling and trending analytics, explore Stability Studies.

Conclusion

Accelerated stability testing is a powerful predictive tool — but it comes with limitations. Pharmaceutical professionals must proactively manage risks by combining scientific modeling, robust study design, validated analytical methods, and statistical analysis. When done correctly, shelf life predictions based on accelerated data can be both reliable and regulatory-ready.

Guidelines for Developing a Stability Protocol as per ICH Q1A(R2)

1) Purpose

The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is to outline the procedure for preparing a stability protocol for drug substances and drug products in compliance with the ICH Q1A(R2) guidelines. This SOP ensures that the stability protocol is comprehensive, clear, and in line with regulatory requirements.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all personnel involved in the preparation and review of stability protocols for drug substances and drug products intended for global markets.

3) Responsibilities

Stability Testing Team: Responsible for drafting the stability protocol in compliance with ICH Q1A(R2) guidelines.

Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Responsible for reviewing and approving the stability protocol.

Regulatory Affairs Team: Responsible for ensuring that the protocol meets regulatory expectations and is aligned with submission requirements.

4) Procedure

4.1 Initial Preparation

4.1.1 Obtain and review the latest version of the ICH Q1A(R2) guidelines.

4.1.2 Identify the drug substance or product and determine the type of stability study required (e.g., long-term, accelerated, or intermediate).

4.2 Components of the Stability Protocol

4.2.1 Include the following sections in the stability protocol:

• Objective and scope of the study
• Details of the drug substance or product, including batch number and manufacturing date
• Storage conditions and time points
• Tests to be conducted, including methods and acceptance criteria
• Responsibilities of the personnel involved
• Schedule for sampling, testing, and reporting

4.3 Approval and Finalization

4.3.1 Submit the draft protocol to the QA Team for review and approval.

4.3.2 Address any discrepancies or required changes identified by the QA Team and finalize the protocol for implementation.

5) Abbreviations, if any

ICH: International Council for Harmonisation
QA: Quality Assurance

6) Documents, if any

Draft stability protocol, approved stability protocol.

7) Reference, if any

ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products.

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0

How Temperature and Humidity Affect Accelerated Stability Testing in Pharma

Accelerated stability testing simulates long-term drug product degradation by exposing samples to elevated temperature and humidity. These environmental factors directly influence the degradation rate and physical integrity of pharmaceuticals. This guide explores the impact of temperature and relative humidity (RH) on accelerated studies and how to optimize test conditions to ensure valid, regulatory-compliant results.

Understanding the Role of Environmental Stressors

Temperature and humidity are the two most critical environmental variables in stability studies. Elevated levels accelerate chemical reactions, hydrolysis, oxidation, and physical changes in pharmaceutical products. ICH Q1A(R2) defines standard conditions for accelerated testing as 40°C ± 2°C and 75% RH ± 5% RH.

Objectives of Controlled Stress Testing:

• Predict real-time stability using short-term data
• Identify degradation pathways under stress
• Assess formulation and packaging robustness

Impact of Temperature on Drug Stability

Temperature affects reaction kinetics. According to the Arrhenius equation, every 10°C rise in temperature approximately doubles the rate of chemical degradation. Elevated temperatures increase molecular motion, destabilizing active ingredients and excipients.

Effects Observed in Accelerated Studies:

• API decomposition and assay failure
• Polymorphic changes in solid dosage forms
• Discoloration or odor formation in suspensions
• Increased impurity levels

Critical Considerations:

• Use stability-indicating methods validated per ICH Q2(R1)
• Test multiple temperature conditions when product sensitivity is unknown

Humidity’s Influence on Product Integrity

Humidity, particularly above 60% RH, can cause hydrolytic degradation, swelling, and microbial risk in moisture-sensitive products. Excipients like lactose, starch, and cellulose are particularly prone to moisture uptake.

Key Effects of High Humidity:

• Tablet softening or swelling
• Capsule shell distortion
• Loss of assay due to hydrolysis
• Caking or deliquescence in powders

Some drugs (e.g., antibiotics, peptides) are highly susceptible to moisture-triggered degradation, requiring controlled testing under modified RH settings.

Climatic Zone Considerations

ICH and WHO classify regions into climatic zones (I–IVb) based on ambient conditions. Accelerated stability testing must reflect the worst-case storage scenario for the intended market.

Study Design and Chamber Qualification

Stability chambers must maintain uniform temperature and humidity conditions throughout the study. Chambers should be qualified and mapped prior to use, ensuring data validity and compliance.

Chamber Qualification Includes:

• Installation Qualification (IQ)
• Operational Qualification (OQ)
• Performance Qualification (PQ)
• Periodic mapping for hot/cold spots

Protocol Design for Stress Studies

A well-crafted protocol ensures consistency, repeatability, and audit-readiness. Include the following elements:

1. Storage conditions and rationale
2. Sample pull schedule (e.g., 0, 3, 6 months)
3. Container closure details
4. Analytical parameters (assay, degradation, physical tests)
5. Acceptance criteria (ICH, USP, IP, etc.)

Environmental conditions should be monitored and logged throughout the study using calibrated sensors.

Case Examples: Impact in Practice

Example 1: Moisture-Sensitive Tablets

A coated tablet with a hygroscopic excipient showed assay failure at 40°C/75% RH within 3 months. Reformulation using a different binder and enhanced desiccant packaging resolved the issue.

Example 2: Temperature-Sensitive Suspension

An oral suspension containing a thermolabile API exhibited phase separation and odor formation after exposure to 40°C. Real-time studies showed acceptable behavior at 25°C, validating the lower temperature storage condition.

Regulatory and Compliance Guidelines

Agencies like CDSCO, USFDA, EMA, and WHO require detailed justification for selected temperature and RH conditions. Deviation from ICH conditions must be supported by scientific rationale.

Documentation Must Include:

• Chamber logs and calibration records
• Analytical validation reports
• Environmental monitoring summaries

For SOP templates and chamber qualification protocols, visit Pharma SOP. For deeper insights into stability testing methodology and climate-based design, refer to Stability Studies.

Conclusion

Temperature and humidity play a defining role in accelerated stability testing. A comprehensive understanding of their influence on degradation kinetics, physical stability, and regulatory outcomes is essential for pharmaceutical professionals. Properly managed, these variables enable predictive shelf-life determination and robust product development strategies.

Key Factors for Designing Effective Real-Time Stability Testing Protocols

Real-time stability testing is a cornerstone of pharmaceutical quality assurance. This guide explores essential design considerations to help pharmaceutical professionals implement robust and regulatory-compliant stability protocols. By applying these insights, you’ll enhance shelf-life prediction accuracy, ensure ICH compliance, and support product registration globally.

Understanding Real-Time Stability Testing

Real-time stability testing involves storing pharmaceutical products under recommended storage conditions over the intended shelf life and testing them at predefined intervals. The objective is to monitor degradation patterns and validate the product’s stability profile under normal usage conditions.

Primary Objectives

• Determine shelf life under labeled storage conditions
• Support product registration and regulatory submissions
• Monitor critical quality attributes (CQA) over time

1. Define the Stability Testing Protocol

A well-defined protocol is the foundation of any stability study. It should outline the study design, sample handling, frequency, testing parameters, and acceptance criteria.

Key Elements to Include:

1. Storage conditions: Per ICH Q1A(R2), use 25°C ± 2°C/60% RH ± 5% RH or relevant climatic zone conditions.
2. Time points: Typically 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months, or up to the full shelf life.
3. Test parameters: Appearance, assay, degradation products, dissolution (for oral dosage forms), water content, container integrity, etc.

2. Select Appropriate Storage Conditions

Conditions must simulate the intended market climate. This is particularly important for global registration. ICH divides the world into climatic zones (I to IVB), and each has different recommended storage conditions.

3. Choose Representative Batches

Include at least three primary production batches per ICH guidelines. If not possible, pilot-scale batches with manufacturing equivalency are acceptable.

Batch Selection Tips:

• Include worst-case scenarios (e.g., max API load, minimal overages)
• Ensure batches are manufactured using validated processes

4. Select the Right Container Closure System

Container closure systems (CCS) influence product stability significantly. Design studies using the final marketed packaging, or justify any differences thoroughly in your submission.

Consider:

• Barrier properties (e.g., moisture permeability)
• Compatibility with the formulation
• Labeling and secondary packaging (e.g., cartons)

5. Determine Testing Frequency

The testing schedule should reflect expected degradation rates and product criticality.

Typical Schedule:

1. First year: Every 3 months
2. Second year: Every 6 months
3. Annually thereafter

Deviations must be scientifically justified and documented thoroughly.

6. Incorporate Analytical Method Validation

Use validated stability-indicating methods. These methods must differentiate degradation products from the active substance and comply with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines.

Ensure the Methods Are:

• Specific and precise
• Stability-indicating
• Validated before stability testing begins

7. Establish Acceptance Criteria

Acceptance criteria should align with pharmacopeial standards (USP, Ph. Eur., IP) and internal quality limits. Clearly state the criteria for each parameter within the protocol.

8. Documentation and Change Control

All procedures, observations, deviations, and test results must be accurately documented. Implement a change control mechanism for any protocol modifications during the study.

Regulatory Documentation Includes:

• Stability protocols
• Raw data and compiled reports
• Summary tables and graphical trends

9. Interpret and Trend the Data

Use graphical tools and regression analysis to predict the shelf life. Consider batch variability, environmental impacts, and packaging influences.

Data Evaluation Best Practices:

• Use linear regression for assay and degradation studies
• Trend moisture content and physical characteristics
• Recalculate shelf life based on confirmed data at each milestone

10. Align with Global Regulatory Requirements

Design studies with global submission in mind. Incorporate requirements from ICH, WHO, EMA, CDSCO, and other relevant bodies to ensure cross-market compliance.

For detailed procedural guidelines, refer to Pharma SOP. To understand broader implications on product stability and lifecycle management, visit Stability Studies.

Conclusion

Designing a robust real-time stability study involves meticulous planning, scientific rationale, and compliance with international guidelines. From selecting climatic conditions to trending analytical data, every decision plays a vital role in ensuring product efficacy and regulatory success. Apply these expert insights to build sound, audit-ready stability programs for your pharmaceutical portfolio.

Standard Operating Procedure for Stability Testing According to PMDA Guidelines

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to provide a standardized procedure for conducting stability studies in compliance with the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) guidelines to ensure the safety, quality, and efficacy of drug products.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all drug products requiring stability testing as per PMDA guidelines. It is relevant to departments involved in production, quality control, quality assurance, and regulatory affairs.

3) Responsibilities

• Quality Control (QC) Team: Conducts stability testing according to PMDA guidelines.
• Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Reviews and approves stability protocols and reports to ensure compliance with PMDA standards.
• Regulatory Affairs Team: Ensures stability data is prepared in accordance with PMDA submission requirements.

4) Procedure

1. Preparation of Stability Protocol
   1. Develop a stability study protocol in alignment with PMDA guidelines, specifying storage conditions, test intervals, and analytical methods.
   2. Submit the protocol for review and approval to the QA team.
2. Execution of Stability Studies
   1. Store samples in stability chambers under specified conditions (e.g., 25°C/60% RH, 30°C/75% RH) as per PMDA requirements.
   2. Conduct tests at defined intervals to evaluate stability parameters such as potency, degradation products, and dissolution.
   3. Document all test results, observations, and any deviations from the protocol.
3. Data Analysis and Reporting
   1. Analyze stability data to ensure compliance with PMDA standards.
   2. Prepare a stability study report for submission to the PMDA, detailing all findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

5) Abbreviations, if any

• QC: Quality Control
• QA: Quality Assurance
• PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
• RH: Relative Humidity

6) Documents, if any

• Stability Study Protocol
• Analytical Test Reports
• Stability Study Report

7) Reference, if any

• PMDA Guidelines on Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Stability Testing Following Post-Approval Changes

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to provide a standardized approach for managing stability testing following post-approval changes to drug substances and products in compliance with US FDA guidelines.

This SOP applies to all stability studies required following post-approval changes, such as formulation, manufacturing process, packaging, or storage conditions, for drug substances and products. It is relevant to departments involved in quality control, quality assurance, regulatory affairs, and production.

3) Responsibilities

• Quality Control (QC) Team: Conducts stability testing as per the revised protocol.
• Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Reviews and approves protocols and stability study results following post-approval changes.
• Regulatory Affairs Team: Ensures all stability data related to post-approval changes comply with US FDA requirements.

4) Procedure

1. Development of Revised Stability Protocol
   1. Draft a revised stability study protocol to account for the post-approval changes, detailing storage conditions, test intervals, and analytical methods.
   2. Submit the revised protocol for review and approval by the QA team.
2. Execution of Stability Studies
   1. Store samples under conditions specified in the revised protocol.
   2. Conduct analytical tests at each interval to assess the impact of post-approval changes on stability parameters.
   3. Document all test results, observations, and deviations from the revised protocol.
3. Data Analysis and Reporting
   1. Analyze stability data to ensure compliance with FDA requirements following post-approval changes.
   2. Prepare a comprehensive stability study report for submission to the FDA, detailing the impact of post-approval changes.

5) Abbreviations, if any

• QC: Quality Control
• QA: Quality Assurance
• FDA: Food and Drug Administration

6) Documents, if any

• Revised Stability Study Protocol
• Analytical Test Reports
• Stability Study Report for Post-Approval Changes

7) Reference, if any

• FDA Guidance for Industry: Changes to an Approved NDA or ANDA

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Stability Testing of New Dosage Forms as per ICH Q1C

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to provide a standardized procedure for conducting stability testing of new dosage forms in compliance with ICH Q1C guidelines to ensure their quality, safety, and efficacy over their intended shelf life.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all new dosage forms that require stability testing under ICH Q1C guidelines. It is relevant to departments involved in production, quality control, quality assurance, and regulatory affairs.

3) Responsibilities

• Quality Control (QC) Team: Conducts stability testing in compliance with ICH Q1C guidelines.
• Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Reviews and approves stability protocols and reports.
• Regulatory Affairs Team: Ensures stability data meets submission requirements.

4) Procedure

1. Preparation of Stability Protocol
   1. Draft a stability study protocol for the new dosage form, specifying storage conditions, test intervals, and analytical methods.
   2. Ensure the protocol complies with ICH Q1C guidelines.
   3. Submit the protocol for review and approval by the QA team.
2. Execution of Stability Studies
   1. Store samples in stability chambers under specified conditions.
   2. Conduct tests at defined intervals to assess stability parameters specific to the new dosage form.
   3. Document all test results, observations, and any deviations from the protocol.
3. Data Analysis and Reporting
   1. Analyze data to ensure compliance with ICH Q1C requirements.
   2. Prepare a comprehensive stability study report for submission to the regulatory authorities.

5) Abbreviations, if any

• QC: Quality Control
• QA: Quality Assurance
• ICH: International Council for Harmonisation

6) Documents, if any

• Stability Study Protocol
• Analytical Test Reports
• Stability Study Report

7) Reference, if any

• ICH Q1C: Stability Testing of New Dosage Forms

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Preparing Stability Reports for ANDAs

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to provide a standardized procedure for developing stability study reports for Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) to the US FDA, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all stability studies conducted in support of ANDA submissions. It is relevant to departments involved in regulatory affairs, quality control, and quality assurance.

3) Responsibilities

• Regulatory Affairs Team: Compiles and submits stability study reports for ANDA submissions.
• Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Reviews and approves stability study reports.
• Quality Control (QC) Team: Provides validated stability data for inclusion in reports.

4) Procedure

1. Data Compilation
   1. Gather all stability data, including test results, storage conditions, and time points.
   2. Ensure data complies with FDA requirements for ANDA submissions.
2. Report Preparation
   1. Prepare stability study reports, including all relevant data, analyses, and interpretations.
   2. Format the report according to FDA guidelines for ANDA submissions.
3. Submission Preparation
   1. Compile the stability documentation as part of the ANDA package.
   2. Submit the package to the Regulatory Affairs team for final review and submission to the FDA.

5) Abbreviations, if any

• ANDA: Abbreviated New Drug Application
• QC: Quality Control
• QA: Quality Assurance
• FDA: Food and Drug Administration

6) Documents, if any

• Stability Data Package
• Stability Report for ANDA Submission

7) Reference, if any

• FDA Guidance for Industry: ANDA Submissions – Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Products

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Stability Study Documentation for NDAs

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to provide a standardized procedure for documenting stability studies in support of New Drug Applications (NDAs) to the US FDA to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all stability studies conducted in support of NDAs to the US FDA. It is relevant to departments involved in regulatory affairs, quality control, and quality assurance.

3) Responsibilities

• Regulatory Affairs Team: Prepares stability study documentation for NDA submission.
• Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Reviews and approves stability study documentation.
• Quality Control (QC) Team: Provides validated data for NDA submissions.

4) Procedure

1. Data Compilation
   1. Gather all stability data, including test results, storage conditions, and time points.
   2. Ensure data is validated and compliant with FDA guidelines.
2. Document Formatting
   1. Format stability data according to FDA requirements, including summaries, tables, and graphs.
   2. Prepare a comprehensive stability report, including all relevant data, analyses, and interpretations.
3. Submission Preparation
   1. Compile the stability documentation as part of the NDA package.
   2. Submit the NDA package to the Regulatory Affairs team for final review and submission to the FDA.

5) Abbreviations, if any

• NDA: New Drug Application
• QC: Quality Control
• QA: Quality Assurance
• FDA: Food and Drug Administration

6) Documents, if any

• Stability Data Package
• Stability Report for NDA Submission

7) Reference, if any

• FDA Guidance for Industry: Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Stability Testing of Modified Release Products

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to provide a standardized approach for conducting stability studies for modified-release products in compliance with US FDA and ICH guidelines to ensure their safety, quality, and efficacy throughout their shelf life.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all modified-release products that require stability testing under FDA and ICH guidelines. It is relevant to departments involved in production, quality control, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance.

3) Responsibilities

• Quality Control (QC) Team: Conducts stability testing as per protocol.
• Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Reviews and approves stability protocols and reports.
• Regulatory Affairs Team: Ensures stability data meets submission requirements.

4) Procedure

1. Preparation of Stability Protocol
   1. Draft a stability study protocol detailing storage conditions, test intervals, and analytical methods.
   2. Ensure the protocol is compliant with FDA and ICH guidelines.
   3. Submit the protocol for review and approval by the QA team.
2. Execution of Stability Studies
   1. Store samples in designated chambers under specified conditions (e.g., 25°C/60% RH, 30°C/65% RH).
   2. Conduct tests at each interval to assess stability parameters specific to modified-release formulations, such as dissolution and drug release profiles.
   3. Document all observations, test results, and any deviations from the protocol.
3. Data Analysis and Reporting
   1. Analyze data to ensure compliance with FDA and ICH guidelines for modified-release products.
   2. Prepare a comprehensive stability study report for submission.

5) Abbreviations, if any

• QC: Quality Control
• QA: Quality Assurance
• ICH: International Council for Harmonisation
• FDA: Food and Drug Administration
• RH: Relative Humidity

6) Documents, if any

• Stability Study Protocol
• Analytical Test Reports
• Stability Study Report

7) Reference, if any

• FDA Guidance for Industry: Extended Release and Long-Acting Products
• ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

8) SOP Version

Version 1.0