Using Historical Data to Drive Risk Models in Stability Testing
Historical data serves multiple roles in protocol design:
Click to read the full article.
Historical data serves multiple roles in protocol design:
Click to read the full article.
A risk-scoring template is a standardized worksheet or software form that allows you to:
Click to read the full article.
Bracketing is a strategy where only the extremes of certain variables (such as strength, container size, or fill volume) are tested. The assumption is that intermediate levels will exhibit stability similar to the extremes.
Click to read the full article.
Gone are the days when exhaustive data alone sufficed. Today’s regulatory bodies such as CDSCO and USFDA emphasize lifecycle risk management. They expect manufacturers to:
Click to read the full article.
Every dataset that supports a risk-based justification must comply with ALCOA+ principles:
Click to read the full article.
Initial risk assessments are based on limited clinical and development data. Once the product is scaled up and released to multiple markets, new variables—like packaging materials, storage locations, and temperature excursions—can alter the risk landscape. Reassessing your stability risk profile ensures:
Click to read the full article.
Risk-based testing prioritizes testing activities based on criticality and likelihood of product degradation. Key elements include:
Click to read the full article.
In the context of stability programs, a deviation is any departure from the approved protocol, standard operating procedures (SOPs), or regulatory expectations. Common deviations include:
Click to read the full article.
Once the initial assessment rules out obvious lab errors, the formal laboratory investigation begins. Use the following checklist:
Click to read the full article.
Failure to record and assess deviations in real-time can have serious consequences, including:
Click to read the full article.
